New Controversial Scheme Permits Civil Servants Two Weeks of Remote Work Overseas Amid Criticism
The UK government’s recent decision to permit civil servants, specifically those from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (Desnz), to work remotely while abroad for up to two weeks annually has sparked a wave of controversy. This policy, intended to support those with overseas family connections, allows for “international remote working” to enhance “family life”. However, the initiative has been met with staunch opposition, deemed as “bonkers” by critics who see it as a drastic departure from traditional public service norms.
The backdrop of this policy shift is critical. Just months prior, ministers rebuked similar propositions, advocating for a more traditional, office-centric approach. Concerns over recruitment challenges in civil service, especially in attracting top talent against more flexible and lucrative private sector offers, appear to have influenced this change. The policy’s defenders highlight its potential to make civil service roles more attractive and adaptable for a globalised workforce.
However, the move has ignited fierce criticism from various quarters. Tory MP Greg Smith lambasted the policy, envisioning a scenario where civil servants “sip cocktails on the beach whilst delivering public services.” He underscored the necessity for civil servants to be physically present in Whitehall, expressing skepticism over the effectiveness of remote work from exotic locations.
Echoing this sentiment, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader, labelled the policy as “stark raving bonkers.” He questioned the seriousness of working remotely, especially from holiday destinations, and suggested a need for a thorough overhaul if such ideas are seriously considered by civil service chiefs.
This controversial policy is unveiled just as the Cabinet Office urged senior managers to increase their physical office presence to over 60% to foster better leadership and productivity. This dichotomy between promoting in-office work while sanctioning remote work abroad has raised questions about the government’s overall stance on remote working and its implications on public service efficiency.